Facebook’s Story Change: Life’s Not a Narrative
by Adam Leipzig
“Once upon a time…” the storyteller says, and we lean forward. We all love being held in a master storyteller’s hands; we love it because it is easier to listen to a story than to tell one.
That’s why Facebook’s new format raises some intriguing questions. At the top of the page, where it used to say “News,” it now says “Stories.” I can chose between seeing “Top Stories Since My Last Visit” (right now, there are 11 of them) or “37 More Recent Stories.”
All of these “Stories” string together in Facebook’s new profile function, Timeline. With Timeline, all of your Facebook posts will flow together in chronological order. “Tell the story of your life,” Facebook promises in its introductory video.
If only it were that easy.
Storytelling’s hard work because, as every writer knows, you have to know where you’re going: Plan your character’s end – then build toward that. For instance, when we’re working on a movie we always start with the third act. Lots of screenwriters can come up with great beginnings, but few can craft a killer third act.
This is especially true when the main character dies. For such a story, the storyteller must build toward the character’s demise with a sense of narrative push – and leave some other characters alive in the aftermath, continuing characters whose lives will be changed, for better or worse, by the death, and who will go on.
After all, the story’s being told to us, the living. We may have identified with the main character, but if the main character dies, we have to go on too. We listen to stories of death because they promise to give some meaning to our lives.
A life is lived forwards, but its story is told in reverse. Just as, in writing a good sentence, an author builds the words logically, with foreknowledge how the sentence must complete, until the words close the sentence at its necessary end, with a period.
Random words don’t make a sentence, and haphazard events don’t make a life’s story.
The problem, of course, is that just as arbitrary events don’t constitute a story, our Facebook posts don’t tell our life stories either, for two reasons.
First, we don’t put everything on Facebook. We have privacy issues (especially with the new changes; here’s how to take better control of your privacy settings), we don’t want advertisers to know all our habits, some things we only share with certain people, and after all, we spend our lives living life, not creating content for Facebook’s pages. Facebook posts are, at best, a random and anecdotal selection of a few things we experience. They may or may not be important. We often don’t know what’s important until well past the event.
Which brings us to the second reason Facebook posts can’t be a story. We don’t know how or when we’ll die. The Greek poet Solon counseled, “Count no man happy until he is dead,” and he was right; we can’t know how to tell the story of a life until it is over.
We may get some attention on Facebook, but we don’t get narrative.
Filed Under: OUR WORLD, Recent Posts, TECHNOLOGIES









Comments (2)
Nico Sabenorio | Steven | Life After Meth | Cultural Weekly
September 29th, 2011 at 4:36 AM
[...] of accomplished filmmaking: strong characters, visual craft, and a narrative structure you’d never get from a string of Facebook posts. - Adam [...]
Alexis
October 8th, 2011 at 1:07 AM
I think the definition of story is evolving as our cultural puts an emphasis on "reality" type story-telling,which of course we all know is scripted and therefor crafted more like a story than the audience realizes. Facebook gives us the satisfaction of being voyeurs and quenches this idea of everyone's life as a story and drama. I personally agree with your thoughts Adam and Dakota. There is the aspect of projection however: for me a good story runs on empathy–even though I am reading or watching specific events and circumstances these characters undergo I get to project my own life on that story. I fill in all those blank spaces with my own emotions and points of view. Humans are self involved and indulgent, so we want stories to give us escape while allowing us to project our own feelings on to them. Facebook somehow does allow for this projection of "real life" because it is "live" and "real." Of course the authenticity of what is real is up for debate and is entirely up to the users discretion of how public his or her private life is.
Leave a reply